The Policy Initiative

  • عربي
    • share
  • subscribe to our mailing list
    By subscribing to our mailing list you will be kept in the know of all our projects, activities and resources
    Thank you for subscribing to our mailing list.
09.08.25

Rebuilding South Lebanon without Public Funds or Foreign Loans

Jamal Ibrahim Haidar

South Lebanon, a region rich in natural resources, culture, and human potential, has long suffered from chronic underdevelopment due to political instability, security concerns, and limited investment. In the wake of recent destruction and ongoing economic collapse, it faces a monumental challenge: rebuilding infrastructure, stimulating private sector activity, reviving the economy, and fostering long-term resilience. Traditionally, such efforts have relied on foreign loans, donor aid, or the national budget. Yet with the Lebanese state fiscally bankrupt and foreign assistance uncertain or politically constrained, the government must turn to creative, non-monetary methods to encourage private investment. A bold, innovative, and self-reliant approach can allow the state to contribute meaningfully to recovery without tapping public funds or incurring new debt.

Encouragingly, incentives are not always financial. Governments worldwide have spurred growth through legal reform, regulatory improvement, land use, and strategic partnerships. This article outlines a roadmap for how the Lebanese government can act as facilitator, regulator, and enabler to rebuild and restart South Lebanon’s economy—using existing assets, underutilized laws, and sound policy frameworks.

1. Land and Real Estate as Development Tools

Unlocking the value of land and real estate is essential. The South holds extensive underused properties, including state-owned and abandoned sites. Instead of politically sensitive sales, the government can offer 25–50-year leases for agriculture, logistics, factories, or tourism. It can also designate industrial, agro-processing, and eco-tourism zones while guaranteeing investors’ rights through transparent contracts. Religious and charitable endowments (waqf) hold further untapped assets. Legal frameworks could allow mosques or churches to lease land for social enterprises or housing, or to enter joint ventures in education, health, and housing. Such measures transform land into non-monetary capital, stimulating construction, jobs, and economic activity.

2. Smart Tax and Customs Incentives

While Lebanon cannot afford subsidies, it can use targeted tax measures that cost little upfront yet generate long-term revenue. These include ten-year tax holidays for companies investing in job creation, and customs exemptions for equipment—machinery, solar panels, irrigation systems—used in the South. Such incentives reduce startup costs and make the region more attractive without direct cash outlays.

3. Policy and Regulatory Reform

Policy reform is vital to attract private capital. One of government’s most powerful tools is simplicity. Starting or expanding a business in Lebanon is notoriously bureaucratic. A “One-Stop Shop” for South Lebanon—digital or physical—could centralize permits, licensing, tax registration, and land approvals. Priority sectors like construction, agriculture, food processing, renewable energy, and tourism could receive fast-track licensing. Clear timelines for permits, swift contract enforcement, and specialized courts for disputes would further reduce uncertainty.

4. Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Innovation and entrepreneurship can be supported without new spending. Vacant public or municipal buildings could be converted into incubators or shared production spaces. Partnerships with universities could expand training, microfinance access, and mentorship in food processing, renewable energy, and agritech. A registry of local suppliers and services could help new businesses connect with partners and build domestic value chains.

5. Leveraging the Diaspora

South Lebanon’s diaspora offers financial capital, skills, and global networks. Rather than soliciting charity, the government could establish a South Lebanon Diaspora Investment Fund, independently governed but policy-backed, to pool capital for profit-driven ventures like solar farms, greenhouses, tourism, or digital infrastructure. “Reconstruction bonds” targeting diaspora investors could offer tax-free returns tied to projects in the South. Skills-return programs could connect diaspora engineers, doctors, and tech experts with local institutions through remote collaboration or short-term fellowships. These measures attract foreign exchange, mobilize private capital, and link the region to global markets.

6. Cooperative Models for Local Economies

Local economies can be revitalized through cooperative models. Instead of relying on state-run services or aid, the government could enable agriculture, crafts, and small industries through cooperatives. Support could include reduced registration fees, standard governance templates, and linkages with banks and buyers. A “Southern Cooperative Alliance” could serve as an umbrella body, assisting co-ops in dairy, olive oil, citrus, and handicrafts with training, bulk purchasing, and e-commerce platforms. Co-ops could also be allowed to operate on public lands with clear leases, regenerating employment in depopulated or war-damaged areas.

7. Tourism and Cultural Assets

South Lebanon’s natural and cultural resources can be monetized. Its mountains, rivers, and archaeological sites hold enormous potential for eco-tourism and cultural industries. The government could grant vetted entrepreneurs or cooperatives concessions to manage heritage sites or eco-parks in exchange for maintenance and job guarantees. A “South Lebanon Tourism Accelerator” could support entrepreneurs with business planning, branding, and digital marketing. Promoting agritourism—linking farmers, guesthouses, and local cuisine—could further boost rural income and reshape the region’s global image.

Conclusion

Lebanon’s constraints are severe, but they cannot justify paralysis. By shifting from spender to enabler, the government can spark reconstruction and revival in South Lebanon. Through land reform, cooperative empowerment, diaspora engagement, and smart regulation, it can attract capital, mobilize communities, and restore dignity—without spending public money or taking on debt.

South Lebanon’s recovery can serve as a model for the rest of Lebanon and for other post-conflict regions striving for self-reliance and sustainable development. What is required for South Lebanon’s reconstruction is not new borrowing, but right policy mix and political will to act as facilitator, regulator, and guarantor. By removing barriers, offering land, legal clarity, and tax relief, and mobilizing local and diaspora talent, the Lebanese government can transform South Lebanon from a zone of crisis into a laboratory for innovative, community-driven growth—demonstrating that recovery without public funds is not only possible, but sustainable.

 


From the same author

view all

More periodicals

view all
Search
Back to top